I would like to start off by saying Me and Earl and the Dying Girl was in no way a bad book. I just didn't really like it. I think this review says more about me than the book itself.
MEDY follows a high school senior named Greg: he's forced into the situation of comforting his ex girlfriend who has leukemia. However, the main conflict of the novel is not that this girl, whom he forms an unlikely friendship with, has cancer, but that he is, in fact, an asshole. Greg S. Gaines doesn't understand life (or death) one bit.
The book starts off with Greg breaking the fourth wall. He did this copious times in the book--a stylistic choice of Jesse Andrews that I wasn't very fond of. It felt like a cop-out, like Greg's informal tone was a joke to such a heavy-topic book. But then again, the entire book felt like a joke.
I at least expected Greg to prove us wrong and have a change of heart in the end. Which he sort of did, but he was still an jerk. Greg never appreciated his family, his friends, or Rachel. It took seeing Rachel on her deathbed for Greg to realize she was dying. I was unimpressed by his childlike behavior toward the whole situation, and silently appreciated Earl in my head when he beat him up in one of the final scenes.
I can't articulate how much it gets on my nerves that there was no point for this book. Greg doesn't take anything away from Rachel's death. The point of a story is growth and development, but there is little of that in this book. At times, it seemed to contradict itself, and Greg's story was incredibly jumbled. It felt like I was reading one of his films--it skipped around all the time, the characters were obnoxiously ungrateful and flat, and there truly was no plot. If this was Andrews' intention, then well done. But I felt like his novel was trying to be something it was not--witty and intelligent, but it felt abrasive and offensive.
The only thing preventing me from giving this book 1 star was the humor and the fact that it was a nice, fast paced read. But I still couldn't get into it, or connect with any of the characters.
Overall, I gave this book two stars. It had a lot of potential, and it was really funny in some parts, but I don't really understand the hype surrounding it. The best thing going for it was the relaxed contemporary style of the book (written in texts and script format), but the lackluster characters were unappealing to me throughout. Still, I'm interested in seeing the movie, hoping that it would fix my many problems with this book. Unfortunately, it was an underwhelming first read for the new year.
I understand your points and if your didn't like Jesse Andrews writing style then yeah I definitely understand why you could have an issue with the book. I always thought that Andrews was going for a very underwhelming tone with Me and Earl-- that is why he kind of just bushed over Rachel's death in the book instead of having it be big a deal. It is trying to say that people are all about the showy aspect of life and leaving their mark when in the end you just fade away and everyone around you just goes back to their lives. Now this doesn't really excuse Greg being a jerk, but I felt that he was made that way on purpose. I wish I could give more examples but it has been a while since I read the book. I hope you like the movie (I enjoyed it more than the book) and I'm not trying to shoot down your opinion just sharing mine! :)
ReplyDeleteThese are all very good thoughts, and I really appreciate you always commenting! Hopefully I watch the movie sometime this year. And I definitely agree about the "showy aspect of life," and personally I feel like that's a despicable part of humanity. Ah well!
Delete